Lady Gaga Issues Letter Addressing Her Fur Use & Calls Kim Kardashian Fabulous

Whether she likes it or not (she does), fashion plate Lady Gaga makes a statement with whatever outlandish get-up she steps onto the street wearing. And given her recent penchant for donning fur, both in public in Bulgaria earlier this week and in a poster for upcoming film Machete Kills, Mother Monster has been feeling she has some explaining to do — especially given PETA’s open letter to Gaga that reminds her that she once told Ellen DeGeneres “I hate fur and I don’t wear fur,” and likens her to “a target just like the mindless Kim Kardashian.” Yee-owch!

First, PETA’s Jeff Mackey wrote the following on the organization’s site on Monday:

Dear Gaga,

Many of your gay fans, I among them, have long admired what you told Ellen: “I hate fur and I don’t wear fur.” I included a link because these recent photos of you in fox and rabbit and with a wolf carcass make it appear that you have amnesia.

I’m also including this brief videohosted by Tim Gunn showing the violent cruelty that you promote when you wear fur. What happened? Are your stylists telling you that it’s fake, or are you a turncoat?

Many gays are animal advocates because we recognize that the same arrogance and indifference that some have toward animal suffering has at times been directed toward us personally because of our orientation. PETA has long participated in Pride events around the country, and just last week, we helped lead protests against Chick-fil-A. But by wearing those dumb furs in a heat wave, you’re making yourself a target just like the mindless Kim Kardashian. As we plan our fall campaigns, please tell us whether what you gracefully told Ellen was heartfelt or just a pose.

At first Lady Gaga’s response was to issue a short statement on her social networking site that read, “For all the press and such that are writing about whether or not my fur is actually real, please don’t forget to credit the designer HERMES. Thank you, LOVE gaga.”

A sampling of her fans’ resulting comments reads as follows:

* “If this is the new era Gaga, I don’t like it.”

* “I would try to find the funny side if I didn’t think the fur industry was a disgusting [trade]…”

* “How could you? That’s so messed up, I though you stood up for better values than fashion at the cost of animal suffering.”

She then offered up this lengthier statement titled “FURGATE PART 1″:

“To the fans. i want you to know that I care deeply about your feelings and views, and I will always support your philosophies about life. We’ve been having over-arching conversations about society, equality, and politics for the past five years, and we should continue. I do not however support violent, abusive, and childish campaigns for ANY CAUSE. Particularly one that I respect. ‘Animal Rights.’ I am choosing not to comment on whether or not the furs I purchase are faux fur-pile or real because I would think it hypercritical not to acknowledge the python, ostrich, cow hide, leather, lamb, alligator, ‘kermit’ and not to mention meat, that I have already worn. This should already put me in a category as one who appreciates and adores the beauty of animals in fashion, but am not a strict vegan. I have truly always stayed away from skinned fur, especially i have never been able to afford a nice one, but this does not mean my morals are rigid and that I won’t bend at the sight of an absolute art piece of a coat. I have no chains about this. You see a carcass, I see a museum pièce de résistance. But I am truly sorry to fans who are upset by this, its a fair and applaudable feeling about the health and safety of animals. I respect your views, please respect mine. And to the campaigners, please save your flour to make bread for the children who are hungry. And Kim Kardashian is fabulous.”

So there you have it, monsters. Do you buy Lady Gaga’s reasoning with regard to what she’s calling Furgate? Do you find her to be hypocritical? Let us know below, or by hitting us up on Facebook and Twitter!

  • MusicSoul

    Hypocritical? yes.

    The Fame has definitely changed Gaga. Calling skinned animal a piece of art is insulting, insensitive, and disrespectful. That “piece of art” did not consent to being slaughtered and skinned for your viewing/wearing pleasure. Gaga should’ve left that “You see a carcass, I see a museum pièce de résistance” out from her statement. Makes her sound like a sell-out in the name of fashion/art. Reminds me of those whale hunters fishing for whales for “science and research” yet they are selling and eating them. Just stop sugar coating your behaviors.

    • Laurie

      Um, no. If anything, she confesses that she is only human but she tries to avoid fur. It is PETA, with its childish demanding and self-contradictory behavior, that is hypocritical, not Gaga.

      • Me

        We all know she IS human. The “Little Monsters” are the ones who think she’s their next savior. The idea is that if you’re going to stand for something, just go with it. Especially when you’re on the Forbes and Influential People lists. Mentioning the designer’s name when asked about whether the fur is real or fake is a sell-out. Calling a skinned animal a piece of art is insensitive. She is a public figure, and it is important for her to know how certain comments can be use against her.

        Trust me, I am not for or against PETA. I don’t agree on many things they do. This is not about PETA for me. I also happen to enjoy Lady Gaga’s music, and I am watching her Born This Way Tour DVD while typing this (lol).

  • Mark Daniel Snyder

    horribly hypocritical. she was against fur before she was for it. stupid excuse.

  • Grayson Smith

    Go hug a tree and get the Buck over it…

  • Logan

    I don’t see whats wrong with it.
    Bitch looks fierce in that wolf pelt.

  • guysee

    She should have skinned her Little Monsters.

  • HopeisHere

    “Lady Gaga, you are a great artist who has used your celebrity to fight for equality and fairness, so I know you are a compassionate loving human being who would not publicly defend others for their unconscious behavior. LET’S NOT SET OFF A CHAIN REACTION WHERE ARTISTS ACT AS SUPPORT FOR A SOCIETY’S UNCONSCIOUS BEHAVIOR. Let’s instead do what artists have done throughout history and be on the side of love and compassion, because that is our natural state.”

    Russell Simons to Lady Gaga

  • womens nike air max 95

    What is the webpage making it easy to understand blog sites and even podcasts? I can’t have an iPod, really does that will make a difference? womens nike air max 95

  • Dagmar Tellez

    This song is amazing!! I love that she’s going more pop, cause her songwriting is great for the genre.

  • Casey-Lynn Porter

    Dear PETA I come from a culture where my ancestors did not just eat the meat. They used the animals fur, bones ect for warmth, art, and whatever else was deemed useful. I agree that to kill an animal for fashion purpose can be cruel but so is denying someone there right to freedom of speech.
    As i recall we live in a culture where we have the rights to express our beliefs freely. Even those deemed a little odd and untolorable.

    So GAGA keep ignoring the haters and keep living free.

    • Ana

      But in our modern society, the animals used in the fur industry are bred and killed JUST for their fur. We don’t eat their flesh or use their bones, their left-overs are actually used to feed the other animals in the fur farm – cannibalism. The fur is used for clothes, the corpses are mashed up and fed to the future generations. Every single aspect of the fur industry is absolutely sick, and there is no other reason for these animals to be in that situation other than the vanity of people like Lady Gaga.

    • Iraklis

      So…do i or anyone else also have the right to kill you and wear your skin as clothing?
      Are you kidding me?

  • Ann

    Use the flour to make bread for hungry children, and use the meat that she wore at some stupid event to feed these same hungry children. She’s so rubbish it’s pathetic.

  • John

    Sorry Gaga I can not respect your view on this issue.