Posts Tagged “grammys2008”
by the numbers
Not that the underlying thesis of this Ad Age story about the decline in ratings experienced by both the Grammys and American Idol should be a surprise to anyone—the piece cites the rise of music-related celebrities who are more famous for their personal lives than their songs and the "natural life cycle" of the now-seven-years-old Idol as two reasons for said shows' crummy numbers—but in case you were wondering just how little of MTV and its formerly "all-about-the-music" sibling MTV2's broadcast time was devoted to music videos these days, you now have an answer: "The cable nets have become cultural chameleons, with the original programming premise — music videos — now only comprising an average of 4.5% of MTV's and 14% of MTV 2's schedule, according to data supplied by the network." [Advertising Age]
feuds
Those of you watching the Grammy telecast on Sunday night may remember the middle-school-caliber speech Beyonce gave as an introduction to Tina Turner, where she ran down all the icons of the past who she wanted to be like before instructing the audience to get on their feet* for Turner, who she referred to as "the Queen." Well, Queen of Soul Aretha Franklin—lumped in as one of the "historical women" who didn't quite measure up to Turner for whatever reason—was not happy with the slight, going so far as to issue a statement: "I am not sure of whose toes I may have stepped on or whose ego I may have bruised between the Grammy writers and Beyoncé, however I dismissed it as a cheap shot for controversy. In addition to that, I thank the Grammys and the voting academy for my 20th Grammy and love to Beyoncé anyway." I seriously doubt that anyone else saw Beyonce's coronation of Turner as a "cheap shot" (I saw of it as yet another indication that the show's writers were clearly scrambling for last minute material), but judge for yourself with the YouTube of the performance—and the cringeworthy text of Beyonce's intro—after the jump.
More »
Aretha Franklin More Annoyed With Grammy Writers Than We Are
Those of you watching the Grammy telecast on Sunday night may remember the middle-school-caliber speech Beyonce gave as an introduction to Tina Turner, where she ran down all the icons of the past who she wanted to be like before instructing the audience to get on their feet* for Turner, who she referred to as "the Queen." Well, Queen of Soul Aretha Franklin—lumped in as one of the "historical women" who didn't quite measure up to Turner for whatever reason—was not happy with the slight, going so far as to issue a statement: "I am not sure of whose toes I may have stepped on or whose ego I may have bruised between the Grammy writers and Beyoncé, however I dismissed it as a cheap shot for controversy. In addition to that, I thank the Grammys and the voting academy for my 20th Grammy and love to Beyoncé anyway." I seriously doubt that anyone else saw Beyonce's coronation of Turner as a "cheap shot" (I saw of it as yet another indication that the show's writers were clearly scrambling for last minute material), but judge for yourself with the YouTube of the performance—and the cringeworthy text of Beyonce's intro—after the jump.
More »
call off the dogs
Perhaps chastened by the low ratings for Sunday's telecast, the Grammy powers that be have allowed YouTube bootlegs of segments from the show to run wild, and right now the entire first page of the video-sharing site's most popular music videos is made up of Grammy clips. (Click the image for a larger version of the top-12 screenshot; unsurprisingly, Universal Music Group artists Amy Winehouse and Kanye West are in there multiple times. But where's Herbie Hancock?) In the grand scheme of YouTube, though, none of the Grammy clips are as popular right now as that one where the hockey player gets sliced in the neck, a fact that is no doubt causing the awards show's producers to rethink next year's centerpiece entertainment. [YouTube]
Grammy Producers Allowing Millions Of Americans Who Missed The Show To Catch Up Via YouTube
Perhaps chastened by the low ratings for Sunday's telecast, the Grammy powers that be have allowed YouTube bootlegs of segments from the show to run wild, and right now the entire first page of the video-sharing site's most popular music videos is made up of Grammy clips. (Click the image for a larger version of the top-12 screenshot; unsurprisingly, Universal Music Group artists Amy Winehouse and Kanye West are in there multiple times. But where's Herbie Hancock?) In the grand scheme of YouTube, though, none of the Grammy clips are as popular right now as that one where the hockey player gets sliced in the neck, a fact that is no doubt causing the awards show's producers to rethink next year's centerpiece entertainment. [YouTube]
postmortem
The promise of seeing Tina Turner perform with Beyonce—and other generational boundaries get kicked in, or at least gently hip-checked—wasn't as much of a turn-on for Joe Television Viewer as executives at CBS thought it would be: Numbers for this year's Grammy telecast were off 12% from last year, and down an astonishing 18.82% among adults 18-49. (Well, OK, those numbers aren't that astonishing given the corresponding drop in album sales this year. But still, not good!) So what happened? Was it the booking? Were the bus ads with just photos of Paul McCartney and Dave Grohl too subtle for potential viewers—and kind of embarrassing for the producers, since Macca wasn't even at the telecast? Or is it just another example of music falling somewhere below ice hockey in terms of pastimes in which Americans are interested—and the music industry doing its damndest to keep its profile plummeting? After the jump, I count down the top five issues faced by last night's telecast, from poor advertising to ill-advised demographic-chasing.
More »
The Top Five Problems With Last Night's Grammy Show (And A Few Possible Solutions)
The promise of seeing Tina Turner perform with Beyonce—and other generational boundaries get kicked in, or at least gently hip-checked—wasn't as much of a turn-on for Joe Television Viewer as executives at CBS thought it would be: Numbers for this year's Grammy telecast were off 12% from last year, and down an astonishing 18.82% among adults 18-49. (Well, OK, those numbers aren't that astonishing given the corresponding drop in album sales this year. But still, not good!) So what happened? Was it the booking? Were the bus ads with just photos of Paul McCartney and Dave Grohl too subtle for potential viewers—and kind of embarrassing for the producers, since Macca wasn't even at the telecast? Or is it just another example of music falling somewhere below ice hockey in terms of pastimes in which Americans are interested—and the music industry doing its damndest to keep its profile plummeting? After the jump, I count down the top five issues faced by last night's telecast, from poor advertising to ill-advised demographic-chasing.
More »
last night's party
Kanye West's Grammy Staredown
While accepting the award for Best Rap Album at last night's Grammys, Kanye West gave a clinic in How To Make The Producers Stop Playing You Off When You Still Have About Half Of Your Acceptance Speech To Get Through. Of course, the fact that he was paying tribute to his deceased mother probably helped him win sympathy points from the showrunners, a fact that's making me wonder just how many lengthy acceptance speeches at the upcoming Oscars are going to be puncutated by well-timed tributes to family members who passed away "recently."
everybody's a winner (except kanye west and amy winehouse and the foo fighters and vince gill)
Judging by the reactions from my living room, my instant-messenger conversations, and the comments section on our Grammy liveblog, people were more than a little surprised when the Album Of The Year winner was announced... and said winner wasn't Kanye West or Amy Winehouse, but Herbie Hancock, whose Joni Mitchell homage River: The Joni Letters took home the night's final prize. I actually wasn't too surprised by Hancock's victory—to quote myself, "if you didn't at least think that Herbie Hancock paying tribute to Joni Mitchell would sway at least half the people who voted for Steely Dan over Eminem a few years back you haven't been paying attention"—but apparently a lot of people were! (Perhaps they forgot that Norah Jones and Corinne Bailey Rae and Tina Turner and Leonard Cohen were also on the album.) So let's put it to all of you: If you had a vote in the Grammy balloting, what would you have chosen as this Grammy year's Album Of The Year? Poll after the jump.
More »
The Grammys' Album Of The Year Upset: Who Should Have Won?
Judging by the reactions from my living room, my instant-messenger conversations, and the comments section on our Grammy liveblog, people were more than a little surprised when the Album Of The Year winner was announced... and said winner wasn't Kanye West or Amy Winehouse, but Herbie Hancock, whose Joni Mitchell homage River: The Joni Letters took home the night's final prize. I actually wasn't too surprised by Hancock's victory—to quote myself, "if you didn't at least think that Herbie Hancock paying tribute to Joni Mitchell would sway at least half the people who voted for Steely Dan over Eminem a few years back you haven't been paying attention"—but apparently a lot of people were! (Perhaps they forgot that Norah Jones and Corinne Bailey Rae and Tina Turner and Leonard Cohen were also on the album.) So let's put it to all of you: If you had a vote in the Grammy balloting, what would you have chosen as this Grammy year's Album Of The Year? Poll after the jump.
More »
putting the pseudo in pseudo-event
Welcome to Idolator's liveblog of the 2008 Grammys, a night that will have many generation-spanning performances and a few that might even span the divide between living and dead. We're on the last 30 minutes of the dueling preshows between E! and the TV Guide Channel, where we basically get to see people get asked the same questions about who they're wearing and why they're on our TVs. Also: Debbie Matenopolous! I guess when you get banished from The View you get to comment on Rihanna's nail polish for money. Which could be considered as "failing up," maybe. Our coverage begins after the jump.
More »
Idolator Live-Blogs The 2008 Grammys: Please Join Us Along The Long Road To Ruin
Welcome to Idolator's liveblog of the 2008 Grammys, a night that will have many generation-spanning performances and a few that might even span the divide between living and dead. We're on the last 30 minutes of the dueling preshows between E! and the TV Guide Channel, where we basically get to see people get asked the same questions about who they're wearing and why they're on our TVs. Also: Debbie Matenopolous! I guess when you get banished from The View you get to comment on Rihanna's nail polish for money. Which could be considered as "failing up," maybe. Our coverage begins after the jump.
More »
putting the pseudo in pseudo-event
In an attempt to figure out who won the awards that weren't important enough to make the Grammy Awards broadcast, I visited the awards show's official site, where I was greeted with the above cascade of undefined values. (Then again, why should the Grammy site be any different than the rest of the music industry in 2008?) While I try and suss out what's going on—especially the mystery over whether or not Tia Carerre won anything—I'll have the red carpet shows on in the background. (Could the TV Guide channel's reception be any more public-access quality? Part of me is inspired to try and fashion some rabbit ears out of a wire hanger, just to see if it'll maybe help things.)
Grammys' Web Site Suffering From Pre-Show Jitters
In an attempt to figure out who won the awards that weren't important enough to make the Grammy Awards broadcast, I visited the awards show's official site, where I was greeted with the above cascade of undefined values. (Then again, why should the Grammy site be any different than the rest of the music industry in 2008?) While I try and suss out what's going on—especially the mystery over whether or not Tia Carerre won anything—I'll have the red carpet shows on in the background. (Could the TV Guide channel's reception be any more public-access quality? Part of me is inspired to try and fashion some rabbit ears out of a wire hanger, just to see if it'll maybe help things.)
breaking
Now the word is that Amy Winehouse has been granted a visa by the U.S. Government—but she won't be making the trip to Los Angeles for Sunday's Grammy Awards, probably because having to fly halfway around the world 48 hours prior to a big performance won't exactly make her already-rock-solid stage presence all that much better. Her rep does note, however, that she "will still be performing via satellite broadcast from London as previously announced this morning," so those trainwreck-expectant execs will still have something to pin their ratings hopes on. [TMZ / Photo: AP]
Amy Winehouse Granted Visa, Still Not Coming To The States For Grammys
Now the word is that Amy Winehouse has been granted a visa by the U.S. Government—but she won't be making the trip to Los Angeles for Sunday's Grammy Awards, probably because having to fly halfway around the world 48 hours prior to a big performance won't exactly make her already-rock-solid stage presence all that much better. Her rep does note, however, that she "will still be performing via satellite broadcast from London as previously announced this morning," so those trainwreck-expectant execs will still have something to pin their ratings hopes on. [TMZ / Photo: AP]
announcements
Yes, that's right—Sunday at 7:30 p.m. ET is when our live coverage of the Grammys, which will be filled with the walking dead and the incredibly awkward, begins. It'll be my first liveblog from my four-person orange couch! Here's the nominee list, so you can read up on who's in, who's out, and who's up for Best Polka Album. And to get you even more excited for Sunday, here are a few final news items on the show, presented in handy bullet form:
More »
Mark Your Calendars: Idolator Is Live-Blogging The Grammys This Sunday
Yes, that's right—Sunday at 7:30 p.m. ET is when our live coverage of the Grammys, which will be filled with the walking dead and the incredibly awkward, begins. It'll be my first liveblog from my four-person orange couch! Here's the nominee list, so you can read up on who's in, who's out, and who's up for Best Polka Album. And to get you even more excited for Sunday, here are a few final news items on the show, presented in handy bullet form: More »
rumors
We're hearing rumors that Alicia Keys' splashy performance at this Sunday's Grammys won't have her singing with Whitney Houston, as previously speculated; instead, she'll share a stage with Frank Sinatra, or rather a "virtual" version of the nearly-10-years-gone crooner. Said holographic fever dream will be projected onto the stage in a fashion similar to the way Elvis Presley appeared on the American Idol charity special alongside a bejumpsuited Celine Dion. (Ah, memories.) No word on what Ol' Blue Eyes and Young Piano Fingers will sing yet, but you can bet your copy of Duets that a saleable version of it will make its way to iTunes faster than you can hum "The Lady Is A (Cross-Promotional) Tramp." [Photo: AP]
Is Alicia Keys Going To Duet With Ol' Blue Eyes At The Grammys?
basic writing
Look, we're all weary of the Amy Winehouse saga, but there's something kind of... off in this story about Grammy nominees who allegedly go against the "disposable pop" grain that doesn't mention the six-time nominee once, yet takes time out to giggle about Christopher Freakin' Cross, whose Album Of The Year/Song Of The Year/Record Of The Year/Best New Artist haul in 1980 can be matched by Winehouse on Sunday night. (For the record, the article's "Five For The Future," as picked by an expert panel that includes USA Today's critics: Miranda Lambert, Ne-Yo, Feist, Taylor Swift, and Fantasia.)
More »
"USA Today" Shows Us How To Write A Grammy Story Without Using The Words "Amy" And "Winehouse"
Look, we're all weary of the Amy Winehouse saga, but there's something kind of... off in this story about Grammy nominees who allegedly go against the "disposable pop" grain that doesn't mention the six-time nominee once, yet takes time out to giggle about Christopher Freakin' Cross, whose Album Of The Year/Song Of The Year/Record Of The Year/Best New Artist haul in 1980 can be matched by Winehouse on Sunday night. (For the record, the article's "Five For The Future," as picked by an expert panel that includes USA Today's critics: Miranda Lambert, Ne-Yo, Feist, Taylor Swift, and Fantasia.)
More »









