<![CDATA[Breaking: Has Stereogum Been Bought For A Song? - Idolator Comments]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/idolator.com.png <![CDATA[Breaking: Has Stereogum Been Bought For A Song? - Idolator Comments]]> http://idolator.com Tue, 05 Jun 2007 01:47:03 EDT Tue, 05 Jun 2007 01:47:03 EDT http://idolator.com/tunes/stereogum/breaking-has-stereogum-been-bought-for-a-song-210172.php <![CDATA[Breaking: Has Stereogum Been Bought For A Song?]]> http://idolator.com/tunes/stereogum/breaking-has-stereogum-been-bought-for-a-song-210172.php#c1597777 Trackback

]]> 33:210172:c1597777 Tue, 05 Jun 2007 01:47:03 EDT <![CDATA[Breaking: Has Stereogum Been Bought For A Song?]]> http://idolator.com/tunes/stereogum/breaking-has-stereogum-been-bought-for-a-song-210172.php#c566652 Coolfer, Ott, Lindsay, Raftery. What a small circle we live in.

The Playlist

]]> 33:210172:c566652 Fri, 27 Oct 2006 19:05:23 EDT <![CDATA[Breaking: Has Stereogum Been Bought For A Song?]]> http://idolator.com/tunes/stereogum/breaking-has-stereogum-been-bought-for-a-song-210172.php#c559615 Scott quit VH1 a long time ago. And yes, Stereogum was originally a livejournal page but Coolfer is correct -- it was a very influential livejournal page (uh, never thought I'd say that sentence.) Scott was probably just being modest in the USA Today interview - as is his way. Good for him!

lindsayism

]]> 33:210172:c559615 Thu, 26 Oct 2006 14:56:57 EDT <![CDATA[Breaking: Has Stereogum Been Bought For A Song?]]> http://idolator.com/tunes/stereogum/breaking-has-stereogum-been-bought-for-a-song-210172.php#c558160 They think you're moody, make 'em think you're crazy. Make 'em think you might snap. They say you got attitude, you show 'em some real attitude.

shallowrewards

]]> 33:210172:c558160 Thu, 26 Oct 2006 10:48:18 EDT <![CDATA[Breaking: Has Stereogum Been Bought For A Song?]]> http://idolator.com/tunes/stereogum/breaking-has-stereogum-been-bought-for-a-song-210172.php#c557824 So I guess Scott didn't get that raise at VH1 after all?

MTS

]]> 33:210172:c557824 Thu, 26 Oct 2006 09:34:56 EDT <![CDATA[Breaking: Has Stereogum Been Bought For A Song?]]> http://idolator.com/tunes/stereogum/breaking-has-stereogum-been-bought-for-a-song-210172.php#c557014 According to an interview with USA Today from last year, Stereogum was a LiveJournal page that didn't become a "proper website" until late 2003:

http://blogs.usatoday.com/popcandy/2005/12/a_qa_with_stere...

Also to investors: I'm accepting offers for a seventh-week anniversary.

Brian Raftery

]]> 33:210172:c557014 Wed, 25 Oct 2006 21:57:08 EDT <![CDATA[Breaking: Has Stereogum Been Bought For A Song?]]> http://idolator.com/tunes/stereogum/breaking-has-stereogum-been-bought-for-a-song-210172.php#c556474 Surely they could have got Ben Gibbard in to write for them -- he already did such good job at selling t-shirts.

That said, if this means more and better Stereogum, I'm all for it.

ElGee

]]> 33:210172:c556474 Wed, 25 Oct 2006 19:44:19 EDT <![CDATA[Breaking: Has Stereogum Been Bought For A Song?]]> http://idolator.com/tunes/stereogum/breaking-has-stereogum-been-bought-for-a-song-210172.php#c556388 Three years old? Stereogum's gotta be older. Coolfer is over three years old, and Scott was going strong when I started.

Note to investors: I'm accepting offers for a fourth birthday present.

coolfer

]]> 33:210172:c556388 Wed, 25 Oct 2006 19:09:26 EDT